🔗 Share this article

The number of reserved positions for Māori representatives on New Zealand councils is set to be slashed by over 50%, after a controversial law change that forced local governments to submit the future of hard-won Indigenous wards to a public vote.

Historical Context on Indigenous Representation

Māori wards, which can include one or more councillors based on local population numbers, were established in 2001 to give Māori electors the option to elect a guaranteed Māori representative in municipal and provincial governments. Initially, councils were only able to establish a Indigenous seat by first putting it to a public vote in their region. Local populations often devoted considerable time generating community backing and urging their local governments to establish Māori wards.

Policy Changes and Administrative Decisions

To address this concern, the previous Labour government allowed municipal authorities to set up a Māori ward without first requiring them to put it to a popular ballot.

But in 2024, the current administration reversed the change, stating communities ought to determine whether to establish Indigenous representation.

Voting Outcomes

The coalition’s law change mandated councils that had created a ward under Labour’s rules to hold binding referendums concurrently with the municipal polls, which concluded on 11 October. Of 42 councils taking part in the public vote, 17 voted to keep their seats, and 25 to abolish theirs – showing numerous areas against guaranteed Māori representation.

These outcomes provided “a crucial move in restoring local democratic control.”

Opposition parties however have condemned the new policy as “racist” and “against Indigenous interests”. Since taking office, the current administration has ushered in extensive reversals to measures intended to enhance Indigenous welfare and political inclusion. The government has stated it aims to terminate “race-based” approaches, and asserts it is dedicated to improving outcomes for Māori and all New Zealanders.

Geographical Splits

The results of the public votes were split down urban-rural lines – most cities required to vote backed Māori wards, while rural regions leaned strongly towards removing them.

“It's unfortunate for the Māori wards that had recently been established – they’re just beginning to find their footing.”

Electoral Participation and Criticism

This year’s municipal polls recorded the lowest voter turnout in over three decades, with less than a third of citizens participating, prompting demands for reform.

The process had been “a farce”.

Comparative Treatment

Councils are able to establish other types of electoral districts – including countryside seats – without initially mandating a public vote. The disparate requirements applied to Māori wards indicated the administration was targeting Māori representation.

“Well, they failed. Many communities have given the government a middle finger response.”

This statement concerned the 17 areas that voted to retain their seats.